Taylor v. LSI CORP. OF AMERICA
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment based on her failure to present material facts demonstrating that her termination from LSI constituted a direct attack on the institution of marriage. Because the Minnesota Human Rights Act more broadly prohibits discrimination based on the identity and situation of an employee’s spouse, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent LSI Corporation of America (LSI) hired appellant LeAnn Taylor in 1988 as a receptionist/secretary. LSI is a Minnesota corporation that manufactures cabinetry and casework primarily…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor v. LSI Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Aase v. Wapiti Meadows Community Technologies & Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Cody John OpheimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016