Legal Opinion
Ward v. Employee Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 17, 1994No. C3-93-2311PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A discharged employee appeals a summary judgment against her claims for breach of an employment contract and discriminatory termination. We agree with the district court’s holding that the employee failed to produce sufficient facts to create triable issues, and we affirm.
FACTS
Carol Ward worked initially as a secretary and then as officer manager for Employee Development Corporation (EDC). EDC is a private company providing vocational rehabilitation services to injured and disabled persons. Ward was forty-eight when she was hired and within one year she was promoted to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Braziel v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Mallon v. U.S. Physical Therapy, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Aase v. Wapiti Meadows Community Technologies & Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. RostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.