Legal Opinion
Fendrich v. Van De Kamp
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1986No. B007053PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate which challenged the constitutionality of certain regulations propounded by the Attorney General of California under The Gaming Registration Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 19800 et seq.). Appellants contend that the Attorney General’s regulations deprive them of due process and equal protection, violate their fundamental right to privacy and are arbitrary and excessive.
Background
Appellants are the limited partners in The Anthony Company (Company). 1 Company was formed in December 1968, to operate a card…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 420 Caregivers, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Metropolitan Creditors Service v. SadriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Chance Management, Inc. v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1995
- Fendrich v. Van de KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gaetani v. Goss-Golden West Sheet Metal Profit Sharing PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.