Legal Opinion
420 Caregivers, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 2012No. B230436PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SORTING, J.*
Appellant in this case is the City of Los Angeles (City). Respondents are various collectives and individual members of collectives (Collectives) currently engaged in the cultivation, distribution, or use of medical marijuana within City limits.1 In the court below, the Collectives *1324filed various separate lawsuits seeking to enjoin enforcement of City ordinance No. 181,069 (Ordinance), passed by the Los Angeles City Council (City Council) on January 26, 2010, and approved by the mayor on February 3, 2010. The Ordinance regulates the number and geographic distribution of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Medical Bd. of Calif. v. ChiarottinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Safe Life Caregivers v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Trinity Holistic Caregivers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
- City of Vallejo v. Ncorp4, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People Ex Rel. Feuer v. FXS Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.