Legal Opinion

Fendrich v. Van de Kamp

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1988No. B028786PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

On June 11, 1986, Fendrich v. Van de Kamp (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 246 [227 Cal.Rptr. 262], affirmed the denial of appellants’ (“Fendrich”) petition for writ of mandate challenging the constitutionality of certain regulations propounded by the Attorney General of California under The Gaming Registration Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 19800 et seq.). However, the matter was remanded to the trial court so that the Attorney General could revise the Gaming Registration renewal fee schedule “to effect a more refined and equitable means of assessing fees.” Pursuant to the remand, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fendrich v. Van De KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Estate of DargieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Yolo v. Los Rios Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API