Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Creditors Service v. Sadri

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1993No. A060580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. Introduction

In this case we hold that a Nevada cause of action to enforce gambling debts incurred at a casino for the purpose of providing the debtor with funds for gambling violates California’s public policy against gambling on credit and thus is unenforceable in this state.

Metropolitan Creditors Service of Sacramento (MCS) challenges a municipal court judgment declining to enforce gambling debts incurred by Soheil Sadri at a Lake Tahoe casino. We affirm.

II. Background

Sadri, a California resident, incurred debts totaling $22,000 over a two-day period in 1991 while gambling…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. West Indies v. First Nat. Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Wong v. Tenneco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cruz Ex Rel. Cruz v. International Collection Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Kelly v. First Astri Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Advanta National Bank v. Kong (In Re Kong)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. EatmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. In Re JafariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API