In Re Cregler
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
In this proceeding begun by a petition for prohibition but by stipulation to be considered as an application for the writ of habeas corpus, petitioner attacks the constitutionality of the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 647 of the Penal Code1 as that section read before it was repealed2 and a new section 647 enacted in 1961. (Stats. 1961, ch. 560.)
*310An alternative writ issued, which hy stipulation is deemed an order to show cause on petition for habeas corpus. On the record which is before us we have concluded that petitioner’s contentions (that the statute is unconstitutionally vague…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Fort v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.