Legal Opinion
Sagstetter v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1995No. C8-94-2170PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
529 N.W.2d 488 (1995)
Richard SAGSTETTER, et al., Appellants,
v.
CITY OF ST. PAUL, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.
No. C8-94-2170.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 4, 1995.
John E. Daubney, John E. Daubney Law Office, St. Paul, for appellants.
Timothy E. Marx, St. Paul City Atty., Jerome J. Segal, Asst. City Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., HARTEN and MINENKO,[*] JJ.
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The Manager of St. Paul Social Services, Division of Parks and Recreation, requested a variance to build a domed softball field. The Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Board of Supervisors v. Carver County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Holasek v. Village of MedinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Rowell v. Board of Adjustment of City of MoorheadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- KRUMMENACHER v. City of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Dean v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Nolan v. City of Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000