Nolan v. City of Eden Prairie
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge
Appellants Stuart Nolan, et al., challenge the respondent City of Eden Prairie’s approval of variances related to a preliminary plat, contending that the approval was in violation of statute and ordinance, and was arbitrary and capricious. Appellants also challenge approval of the preliminary plat, contending that a council member who had an unlawful conflict of interest cast the deciding vote. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents James Perkins, et al., own lakefront property located on Willow Creek Road. In 1989, the city approved a subdivision of the property into three…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Merriam Park Community Council, Inc. v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- KRUMMENACHER v. City of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Mohler v. City of St. Louis ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Krummenacher v. City of MinnetonkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009