Legal Opinion

Arnett Ex Rel. Arnett v. Yeago

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1957No. 607PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendants have two assignments of error. The first is to the denial of their motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. The defendants offered no evidence. The second is formal: failure to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the law and the evidence, and the entry of the judgment.

The defendants are husband and wife. At the time in question the husband owned a 1951 Pontiac four-door sedan. Prior to the introduction of evidence, the defendants stipulated “into the record judicially” that on 22 June 1955 Mrs. Lorraine Yeago, as a member of Joe Yeago’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Stark v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Southern Oil Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Tyndall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1969
  3. Bundy v. BelueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Herring v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Krider v. MartelloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API