Legal Opinion
Tyndall v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 15, 1969No. Civ. A. Nos. 1294-1298PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and JUDGMENT
DALTON, District Judge.
This action is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b) and §§ 2671-2680, of the Federal Tort Claims Act. The government has moved for summary judgment upon the facts appearing in the pleadings, depositions, and stipulations filed with this court, claiming that as a matter of law the government is not liable to the plaintiff under the following circumstances, some of which appear indistinctly in the record.
About 10:30 p.m. on October 5, 1967, Donald L. Tyndall, his wife and their three children, the plaintiffs, were riding in their car on North Carolina Route…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Zinck v. WhelanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Johnson v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Pinckney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.