Legal Opinion

Krider v. Martello

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1960No. 521PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The record and brief present only this question: Did the court err in refusing to allow the motion to nonsuit?

Appellant contends that the motion should have been allowed because plaintiff failed to establish her allegation that defendant entered the intersection when forbidden to do so by a red light.

Each defendant made statements to traffic officers investigating the collision. Each told the officer the light was green on his side. Plaintiff testified that the light was green as appellant approached the intersection but that she last saw it when two or three car lengths away.

There is merit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stegall v. SledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Queen City Coach Co. v. BurrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Andrews v. SprottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Arnett Ex Rel. Arnett v. YeagoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Southern Oil Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Smith v. KilburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Widenhouse v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Rector v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API