Stark v. Holtzclaw
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
In an amended declaration filed by the plaintiff in error it is alleged that electric companies operated lines of electric railway, and that the “defendants in the operation of its said property suffered and permitted to remain upon its said right of way, directly at and near a station on said Bay Shore Line, known as Patterson Station, a Magnolia Tree, of great height and numerous limbs and low-hanging branches; which said tree was on the right of way of said defendants, directly across the track from said depot or station, and unfenced, and the said defendants in the maintenance and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Temple v. McComb City Electric Light & Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1906
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Cassel v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Rice v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. BridgemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Orme v. Burr Burch v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Burns v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.