Legal Opinion
National Audubon Society v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 23, 1997No. C5-97-391PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s order dismissing their claim brought pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Appellants also challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment for respondents, in which the court held that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in its decision not to require an environmental impact statement, arguing the administrative record was sanitized by the MPCA. We affirm.
FACTS
Since 1983, , the Potlatch…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Pope County Mothers v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Lakes & Parks Alliance v. Federal Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Fine v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.