Legal Opinion
Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range Resources
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1995No. C2-94-2245PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
In this appeal, the Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action (the Rangers) and Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) challenge the district court’s summary judgment affirming a determination of St. Louis County that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was unnecessary for a golf course development project sponsored by the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB). The district court affirmed St. Louis County’s determination that an EIS was unnecessary under the Minnesota Environmental Protection Act (MEPA) because it did not have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Coalition on Sensible Transportation, Inc. v. Elizabeth DoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Piedmont Heights Civic Club, Inc. v. Thomas D. MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- National Audubon Society v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Friends of Twin Lakes v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re American Iron and Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.