Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Board of Optometry v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1967No. 8026PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from "a decision of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, denying a preliminary injunction. The appellant, herein referred to as Board, sought to enjoin the appellee, herein referred to as Sears, from engaging in the unlawful practice of optometry under the authority of A.R.S. § 32-1758.
The trial court after hearing evidence offered by the Board sustained a motion by Sears denying the injunction, and entered the following conclusions of law: “1. At no time stated herein has defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co. been engaged, nor is it now engaged, in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Funk Jewelry Co. v. State Ex Rel. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of OptometryMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Zale Jewelry Co. of Wichita, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
3Cited by7 opinions
- Massengale v. Oklahoma Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bronstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Fallahzadeh v. GhorbanianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re Adoption of N.J.A.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.