Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 The primary question in this matter is whether an “outpatient treatment center” as described in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 36-405(B)(l) and Arizona Administrative Code (“A.A.C.”) R9-10101(39), which employs physicians and chiro-praetors, may be owned by persons who are not licensed physicians or chiropractors. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s decision that the ownership structure of such an entity is statutorily permitted.
I
¶ 2 Midtown Medical Group, Inc., doing business as Priority Medical Center, Inc. (“the Center”), is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Beeck v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Knape v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Bernardi v. Community Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Awsienko v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Sorrell v. Gaarde-MortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Bates v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Marsh v. ColesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Marsh v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.