Legal Opinion
Bronstein v. Board of Registration in Optometry
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 20, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
Alan Bronstein, a registered optometrist, 1 challenges a decision and order of the Board of Registration in Optometry (board). The board concluded that Bronstein violated the prohibition of fee sharing in 246 Code Mass. Regs. § 5.06 (1986) by practicing optometry in offices rented under percentage lease arrangements, and that he violated G. L. c. 112, § 73B (1986 ed.) by failing to provide entrances into his optometric offices separate from the entrances to premises on which eyeglasses are sold by another. The board ordered Bronstein to remedy the violations within forty-five days of his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Blake v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Department of Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms v. GaliotoSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Doe v. BryanNevada Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roslindale Motor Sales, Inc. v. Police Commr. of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Chief Medical ExaminerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Massengale v. Oklahoma Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Branch v. Commonwealth Employment Relations BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Fallahzadeh v. GhorbanianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.