Funk Jewelry Co. v. State Ex Rel. La Prade
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— This is an action by the state, on the relation of the Attorney General, to enjoin the defendant Funk Jewelry Company, a corporation, from practicing optometry. The answer to the complaint consists of a plea in bar, a general demurrer, and a general denial. The plea in bar and the demurrer were overruled, and the trial proceeded, with the result that the court entered judgment enjoining the defendant as prayed.
The principal question necessary for us to decide is whether the complaint, alleging that the corpora-' tion defendant, through a registered optometrist, is employing objective and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Childs v. SmeltzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans' Jewelers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Kendall v. BeilingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.