Legal Opinion
Scott v. Jordan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1983No. 5828PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
Defendant, A.R. Pike Jordan, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Orville Keith Scott and Mildred E. Scott, determining that defendant’s livestock feeding operation constituted a nuisance and permanently enjoining defendant from operating his cattle feedlot in its present location.
Defendant contends on appeal that the judgment of the trial court was erroneous because: (1) the enjoined activities of defendant were not unreasonable; (2) acquiescence of plaintiffs should have precluded the granting of injunctive relief; and (3) the granting of a permanent…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pate v. City of MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Kriener v. Turkey Valley Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Padilla v. LawrenceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nosker v. Trinity Land Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- City of Albuquerque v. State Ex Rel. Village of Los Ranchos De AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Oxley v. City of Tulsa Ex Rel. Tulsa Airport AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.