Legal Opinion

Oxley v. City of Tulsa Ex Rel. Tulsa Airport Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1990No. 67016PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Action below for inverse condemnation. Appellant, Oxley, is the owner of approximately sixty (60) acres of land adjacent to, and partially surrounded by, the Tulsa International Airport. The chronology of events and facts are largely undisputed.

Appellant purchased the property at issue in 1951. At the time, the airport was much smaller, and used only by propeller driven aircraft. Appellant built his family home on the premises and began a horse breeding operation, all without disturbance by the airplanes using the facility.

A year later, the east runway to the airport was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Mattoon v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Henthorn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Scott v. JordanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Capshaw v. Gulf Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Carter v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. v. Woolsey & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API