Legal Opinion

Pate v. City of Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1981PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

Appellants filed an action in the Chancery Court of Weakley County seeking the abatement of a nuisance and damages to real property resulting from the nuisance. The chancellor found that a sewage lagoon, owned and maintained by the City of Martin, was a permanent nuisance and awarded appellants $10,000.00 in damages. The chancellor also found that “an injunction would be too harsh a remedy and should be denied.” The Court of Appeals concurred in the chancellor’s finding that the lagoon, as maintained, is a nuisance; however, the court classed the nuisance as temporary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  2. Louisville & Nashville Terminal Co. v. LellyettTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Murfreesboro v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. City of Nashville v. NevinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  5. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Velda J. Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bolin v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Carpenter v. Double R Cattle Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Paduch v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API