Legal Opinion
Schleifer Ex Rel. Schleifer v. City of Charlottesville
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1998No. 97-1723PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge ERVIN joined. Judge MICHAEL wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge:
This appeal involves a challenge to the constitutionality of a juvenile nocturnal curfew ordinance enacted by the City of Char-lottesville. The district court held that the ordinance did not violate the constitutional rights of minors, their parents, or other af*846fected parties and declined to enjoin its enforcement. We agree that the ordinance is constitutional and affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
On…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Aid for Women v. FoulstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Ramos ex rel. Ramos v. Town of VernonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- State v. T.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.