Legal Opinion
State v. T.M.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 17, 2000No. 2D98-3778PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s order declaring the City of Pinellas Park’s juvenile curfew ordinance to be an unconstitutional restriction on a parent’s fundamental right to raise his or her child. We reverse.
THE CURFEW ORDINANCE
The City originally adopted its juvenile curfew ordinance on May 22, 1997, to reduce juvenile crime and victimization. The ordinance declares it unlawful for a juvenile to be or remain in a public place or establishment between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day, Sunday through Thursday, and 12:01 a.m. through 6:00 a.m. on Saturdays,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- T.M. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.