Legal Opinion
Aid for Women v. Foulston
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 27, 2006No. 04-3310PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Court, on its own motion, has amended the Order and Judgment filed January 27, 2006, nunc pro tunc to that date. In addition, we direct publication.
The amended opinion is attached to this order.
The petition for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. As no judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on the en banc request, that petition is also denied.
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
A Kansas statute requires doctors, teachers, and other individuals to notify *1106the state government whenever they have…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of RoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. BurwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.