Legal Opinion

Frischer & Co. v. Elting

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 18, 1932No. 197PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The eomplainants-appellants who sought to import the articles containing synthetic phenolic resin assign error in the decree dismissing the bill of complaint on the ground that:(1) Section 316 of the Tariff Act (19 USC A §§ 17A-180) is unconstitutional because it constitutes an unlawful delegation of legislative power to the President.(2) The findings of the Commission on which the President’s order was based were unlawful (a) because not concurred in by a majority of its members; (b) because the Commission assumed to determine that the articles sought to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Orion Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  2. Richmond Hosiery Mills v. CampDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1934
  3. Amchanitzky v. CarrougherDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
  4. In Re Orion Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. United States v. ALA Schechter Poultry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API