Legal Opinion
In Re Orion Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 23, 1934No. Customs Appeal 3682PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
In July, 1932, Hookless Fastener Company,* a Pennsylvania corporation, filed a complaint with the United States Tariff Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1939 (19 USCA § 1337), setting forth that it *459was engaged in the manufacture and sale of slide hookless fasteners. The complaint alloged that it was operating as the assignee of nine patents, numbered as follows:
Sundbaek, No. 1,219,881, granted March 20 1917 ’
Sundbaek, No. 1,243,458, granted October 16, 1917.
Sundbaek, No. 1,302,606, granted May 6, ’ ’
Sundbaek, No. 1,566,996, granted Decernber 22,1925.
Whit…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Gemtron Corp. v. Saint-Gobain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re Amtorg Trading CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.