Legal Opinion

Amchanitzky v. Carrougher

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1933No. 5732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a motion for judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint (petition) under New York Rules of Civil Practice, rule 106, because (1) it appears from the face of the pleading that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject-matter, and (2) that no cause of action is stated against the defendant.

The notice of motion asserts a special appearance for the purpose of the motion only.

In effect, the defendant offers what would have been called a demurrer under earlier practice, but why that must be poised upon a special appearance where lack of jurisdiction over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Stevenson v. Holstein-Friesian Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Frischer & Co. v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. White v. County Democratic Executive Committee of Harris CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amchanitzky v. SinnottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Getty v. GaffySupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API