Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Richmond Hosiery Mills v. Camp

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided May 18, 1934No. 758PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNDERWOOD, District Judge.

Complainant, a manufacturer of hosiery, having plants located in Georgia and Tennessee and doing an interstate business, filed this bill against Lawrence S. Camp, United States Attorney, seeking to enjoin him from prosecuting complainant for violation of the National Hosiery Code, or otherwise attempting to enforce against it the provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195) “in so far as said Act or any code or regulation thereunder might impose a limitation or restriction in the operation of complainant’s productive machinery.” Complainant…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MillsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
  2. United States v. Canfield Lumber Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1934
  3. United States v. James W. McAlister, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1934
  4. Schlesinger v. Kofsky-Moos, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Reams v. DushaLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API