Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1929No. 17, OriginalPublishedCited by 281 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This is a petition for a writ of prohibition to the Court of Customs Appeals prohibiting it from entertaining an appeal from findings of the Tariff Commission in a proceeding begun and conducted under § 316 of the Tariff Act of 1922, c. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 943; §§ 174-179, Title 19, U. S. C. A rule to show cause was issued; return was made, to the rule; and a hearing has been had on the petition and return.

Section 3Í6 of the Tariff Act is long and not happily drafted. A summary of it will suffice for present purposes. It is designed to protect domestic industry and trade against “ unfair…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by281 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API