Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chapman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 29, 2011No. Civil No. WDQ-03-1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) sued Nathan Chapman, Chapman Capital Management (“CCM”),1 and others for securities fraud and related claims. For the following reasons, the SEC’s motion for partial summary judgment against Chapman will be granted. Its motion for partial summary judgment against CCM will be denied, but default judgment will be entered on all claims asserted against it.
1. Background2
Before 1999, Chapman founded and was the chairman of the board, chief executive *850officer (“CEO”), and majority shareholder of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Solutions Monthly Income Fund, LPDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHAPMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daryl M. DavisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.