State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Municipal Corporations
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
This appeal presents the following questions for determination:
1. Was the action of the Commission erroneous when it refused to establish rates for sales to municipalities for resale identical with rates for sales to rural electric cooperatives, although conditions of the sales differed and no sales to cooperatives were in fact being made?
2. Was the action of the Commission erroneous when it refused to require service to a municipality for resale (with relatively low load factor and relatively high peak loads at the time of the company’s system peak load) at a rate designed for service…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Ford v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- In Re MannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.