Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1953No. 24PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

This proceeding was instituted by the application of the Nantahala Power & Light Company to the Utilities Commission for authority to increase its rates for electric power distributed to customers for industrial purposes. Consequent upon an order by the Commission authorizing the increase and later denying the petition of Mead Corporation to rehear, the matter came on to be heard, on appeal, by the Judge of the Superior Court. From an adverse judgment in the Superior Court the appellant, the Nantahala Power & Light Company, brings the case here for review.

The statute governing procedure…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Associated PressNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. State Ex Rel. Laundry, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API