Legal Opinion
Ford v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1943No. 8106PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge1 Brewster
of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the Court.
P. S. Ford, petitioner, sued Rio Grande Valley Gas Company, respondent, under Art. 1438, R. S., 1925, to recover an alleged overcharge for natural gas purchased by him to operate a laundry and cleaning plant in McAllen. A trial court judgment for Ford was reversed and rendered for respondent by the Court of Civil Appeals. 169 S. W. (2d) 263.
Ford alleged that he was given a commercial rate graduated from 30 cents to 20 cents per thousand cubic feet, according to his maximum monthly consumption, but that six…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. Doering Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. Doering Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. Hilltop Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Bilton Machine Tool Co. v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Texas Alarm & Signal Ass'n v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Black v. City of Killeen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.