Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 23, 1925No. 25PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
This suit, under § 16 of the Act to Regulate Commerce, February 4, 1887, c. 104, 24 Stat. 379, 384, was brought against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad in the federal district court for northern Alabama. By it the SlossSheffield Company sought to recover $63,982.80 with interest, being the amount of a reparation order entered' by the Interstate Commerce Commission for excessive freight charges exacted in violation of § 1 of the Act. 60 I. C. C. 595 ; 62 I. C. C. 646. The charges here in question were paid between April 17, 1910 and September 15, 1915, on shipments of pig iron from the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Export Drum Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.