State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
The primary issue presented is whether G.S. § 62434(e) as it existed at the time of the proceedings in question permitted a utility in a fuel clause proceeding to obtain any increase or adjustment in its rates and charges to recover any of its costs or expenses for purchased power. We hold that the statute as it then existed did not permit recovery for any portion of purchased power costs in a fuel clause proceeding and that the cost of purchased power, if recoverable, was recoverable only in the general rate cases. We hold that the Commission erred in CP&L Docket No. E-2, Sub…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Conservation CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.