Legal Opinion

City of Corona v. Naulls

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 2008No. E042772PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

The trial court issued a preliminary injunction preventing Ronald Naulls and his business enterprise, Healing Nations Collective (HNC), a medical marijuana dispensary operating within the City of Corona (the City), from conducting any further operations. The court found that, because HNC was “operating as a non-permitted, non-conforming use,” its operation “constitutes a nuisance per se, which the City may abate by seeking injunctive relief in this Court.” On appeal, Naulls and HNC challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the order, contending the court’s finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Hernandez v. City of HanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. County of Los Angeles v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API