Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 2011No. B216432PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
Martin Hill and the Alternative Medicinal Collective of Covina (defendants) appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting them from dispensing marijuana anywhere in the unincorporated area of Los Angeles County (County) without first obtaining the necessary licenses and permits required by County ordinances. Defendants contend that the order granting the injunction should be reversed because the County’s *864ordinances regulating medical marijuana dispensaries (MMD’s) are preempted by state law, inconsistent with state law and unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Board of Supervisors v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Maral v. City of Live OakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Browne v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Conejo Wellness Center, Inc. v. City of Agoura HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- 420 Caregivers, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.