Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Cerestar USA, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2002No. 45A03-0109-CV-314PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Rick Armstrong (“Armstrong”) appeals the Lake Circuit Court’s decision to grant Cerestar USA, Inc. f/k/a American Maize, Inc.’s (“Cerestar”) Motion to Strike expert testimony submitted by Armstrong and Cerestar’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Armstrong’s issues on appeal are reordered and restated as:

I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted Ceres-tar’s Motion to Strike expert testimony submitted by Armstrong;

II. Whether the trial court erred when it granted Cerestar’s Motion for Summary Judgment after determining that there was no genuine issue of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Koch Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Joseph L. LeClair v. Hector LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. Charlotte Robinson v. Davol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Stumpf v. Hagerman Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Beatty v. LaFountaineIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API