Armstrong v. Cerestar USA, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Rick Armstrong (“Armstrong”) appeals the Lake Circuit Court’s decision to grant Cerestar USA, Inc. f/k/a American Maize, Inc.’s (“Cerestar”) Motion to Strike expert testimony submitted by Armstrong and Cerestar’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Armstrong’s issues on appeal are reordered and restated as:
I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted Ceres-tar’s Motion to Strike expert testimony submitted by Armstrong;
II. Whether the trial court erred when it granted Cerestar’s Motion for Summary Judgment after determining that there was no genuine issue of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Higgins v. Koch Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Joseph L. LeClair v. Hector LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Charlotte Robinson v. Davol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Stumpf v. Hagerman Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Beatty v. LaFountaineIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.