Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Meads

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1991No. 92S03-9104-CV-287PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This appeal raises the question of what duty an Indiana landowner or occupier owes to his social guests to protect them from physical harm while they are on his premises. We hold that the duty is to exercise reasonable care.

In this case, Thomas Burrell, the guest, and Kenneth Meads, the landowner, had been friends for years. The two men had helped each other perform a variety of tasks, and neither had ever compensated the other for his services.

On April 9, 1986, Burrell worked on his car in Meads' garage. As Burrell was preparing to leave, Meads told him that he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Robin Austin v. Walgreen CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Brian Yost v. Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity- Indiana Gamma Chapter at Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, Inc., and Nathan CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API