Legal Opinion

Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1982No. 3-580A146PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants James and Wilda Perry appeal a summary judgment granted to defendant-appellee Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO). The Perrys claim there are genuine issues of material fact concerning NIPSCO’s liability for James’ injury, sustained when he fell while working on new construction at a NIPSCO plant.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The purpose underlying the summary judgment procedure is to terminate those causes of action which have no factual disputes and thus may be determined as a matter of law. 1 However, the summary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API