Stumpf v. Hagerman Construction Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Nathan and Sarisa Stumpf (“the Stumpfs”) appeal from the Allen Superior Court’s entry of summary judgment. On appeal, the Stumpfs raise several issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment to Hager-man Construction Corporation (“Hager-man”) and D.A. Dodd, Inc. (“Dodd”); and
II. Whether the trial court erroneously struck the deposition of expert witness Frank Burg. 1
Concluding that Hagerman and Dodd assumed a contractual duty of care to the Stumpfs, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for proceedings…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Michael Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc. and BMH Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Craft MechanicalIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Illinois Bulk Carrier, Inc. v. Jackson Ex Rel. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Seiwert v. Spencer-Owen Community School Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Shawnee Construction & Engineering, Inc. v. StanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. GarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.