Legal Opinion

Toland v. Earl

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1900No. S.F. No. 2076PublishedCited by 40 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This action was brought by the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Mary B. Toland, deceased, for the purpose of having the probate court instructed as to what distribution shall he made of the estate under the will. There is a general averment in the complaint that differences exist between plaintiff and the defendants and among the defendants themselves, by reason of which plaintiff is nnable to properly administer said estate, and some of the doubts relate to controversies not within the jurisdiction of the court sitting as a court of probate. But nowhere in the complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Rosenberg v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API