Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Nastos

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1960No. Civ. 24275PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Cross-appeals are here presented from a judgment for damages for fraud in the sale to plaintiff of real property near Lancaster. The action was brought against the owner (defendant Asemo Nastos), the latter’s two sons (Jim and Louis Nastos), the real estate broker (defendant Rankin) and one Terkleson who was employed by Rankin. Judgment was rendered against Rankin alone for $1,419.73, plus interest, which sum represented the money spent by plaintiff (after she took possession) to put into operation a water well on the premises. In addition to the appeal by Rankin, plaintiff has…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  2. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API