Legal Opinion

Williams v. Graham

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1948No. Civ. 15965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Defendant Graham agreed to convey certain real property to. plaintiff. The latter agreed to convey it to intervener. Upon defendant’s failure to make a conveyance plaintiff brought this action to compel specific performance of the agreement. Intervener filed his complaint in intervention praying judgment in his favor for specific performance in the event that plaintiff should be successful in his action against defendant, or in the alternative for the damages suffered by him if plaintiff should be unable to convey title.

Upon trial of the case on the issues arising between plaintiff and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. McCowen v. PewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Hartman v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Sixta v. OchsnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API