Legal Opinion

Sixta v. Ochsner

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1960No. Civ. 18904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOLDRICK, J. pro tern. *

This action involves a complaint by one Frank D. Sixta for rescission of a contract for the purchase of certain real and personal property; eaneella tion of the deed, promissory note and deed of trust given pursuant thereto; restitution of plaintiff’s down payment ; and for consequential damages. Defendant Hilda C. Oehsner cross-complained against one Celia S. Parsons for $10,000 in damages, said cross-complaint purportedly alleging fraud, breach of contract and failure of consideration, mutual mistake, and negligent misrepresentation, all in connection with a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ankeny v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Hartman v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Allstate Insurance v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API