Legal Opinion

Parowan Mercantile Co. v. Gurr

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1934No. 5358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoffat, J.

This action was brought to recover upon a joint promissory note. It is alleged, and the record discloses, that on or about the 26th day of July, 1931, John H. Gurr and Gwen M. Gurr, his wife, executed and delivered to the Parowan Mercantile Company their joint promissory note. That there after, on or about April 30, 1932, John H. Gurr died intestate. That the note had matured before his death and was unpaid.

Suit was filed on the 9th day of May, 1932, against Gwen M. Gurr and “First Doe, Administrator of the estate of John H. Gurr, deceased.”

On June 28, 1932, Gwen M. Gurr filed her separate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Mitchell v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Madsen v. Utah Light & Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Sheppick v. SheppickUtah Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Withers v. Golding, Director Dept. of RegistrationUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Duncan v. Hemmelwright Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. St. George & Washington Canal Co. v. Hurricane Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API