Legal Opinion

Dillon Implement Co. v. Cleaveland

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1906No. 1786PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by the Dillon Implement Company against G-. R. Cleaveland and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

The plaintiff, a corporation, engaged at Dillon, Montana, in the business of buying and selling grain, commenced this action in the district court of Salt Lake county, against the defendants, who are commission merchants at Salt Lake City, to recover the sum of $777, for oats sold and delivered by it to them between September 1 and December 15, 1902, which, it was alleged in the complaint, the defendants agreed to pay, but failed to do so. The defendants answered, and by way of counterclaim alleged that on the 22 d day of September, 1902, the plaintiff and the defendants entered into a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Klopenstine v. HaysUtah Supreme Court · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. C. I. T. Corporation v. ElliottIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Houtz v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Baker v. Hatch, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. George v. Fritsch Loan & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API