Duncan v. Hemmelwright Et Ux.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
Appeal on the judgment roll from a decree of the Seventh District Court quieting title to certain lands in the defendants.
The pleadings in this case are long, prolix, and redundant with allegations of evidentiary facts and arguments. They áre further encumbered with numerous documents, which are incorporated by reference, and which are wholly unnecessary for the purpose of framing issues of fact. At best, such redundancies cannot enhance the pleadings; at worst, they tend to becloud the issues and increase greatly the work of both the trial and appellate courts. For the reason…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jankele v. Texas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
- Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Baker v. Hatch, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- Holm v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- Mills v. GrayUtah Supreme Court · 1917
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kinkella v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Barlow Society v. Commercial Security BankUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Sorenson v. BeersUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PrettymanUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Floor v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.