Legal Opinion

Sheppick v. Sheppick

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1914No. 2528PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action to quiet title by William Sheppick against William G. Sheppick, in which Thomas Sheppick and another, executors under his will, were substituted for defendant. Judgment awarding a half interest to each party. Defendants appeal and plaintiff takes a cross appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

FRICK J.. This action was originally commenced, by William Shep-pick against bis father, William G. Sheppick. After tbe action bad proceeded to judgment tbe father died, and bis tw'o sons, Thomas and Herbert Sheppick, were substituted as executors of tbe father’s will and estate. Tbe mother bad also died some time prior to tbe death of tbe father, and in what is said hereafter, we, for convenience, shall treat tbe father as still living, and whom we shall designate as defendant. The action was commenced by the plaintiff to quiet the title to a certain parcel of real estate of about seven…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eddington v. Union Portland Cement Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Snyder v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Piper v. EakleUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Duncan v. Hemmelwright Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hall v. SabeyUtah Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API